confused about __str__ vs. __repr__
Neal Becker
ndbecker2 at gmail.com
Thu Dec 18 10:49:27 EST 2008
Diez B. Roggisch wrote:
> Neal Becker wrote:
>
>> Tino Wildenhain wrote:
>>
>>> Neal Becker wrote:
>>> ...
>>>>>> So if __str__ is "meant for human eyes", then why isn't print using
>>>>>> it!
>>>>> it is:
>>>>>
>>>>> > print x
>>>>> str
>>>>>
>>>>> but dict just uses repr() for all its childs to print.
>>>>>
>>>>> T.
>>>> That makes no sense to me. If I call 'print' on a container, why
>>>> wouldn't it recursively print on the contained objects? Since print
>>>> means call str, printing a container should recursively call str on the
>>>> objects.
>>>
>>> Every class is free on how to best implement __str__, you will find
>>> the same behavior on tuple and list as well.
>>>
>>> Maybe its discussable to change the implementation sensibly, best if you
>>> would come with a proposal? Perhaps pprint.pprint is a starting point?
>>>
>>> Regards
>>> Tino
>>
>> First, I'd like to know if there is a rationale for the current design.
>> Am I correct in thinking this is a defect?
>
> I don't think so. First of all, there is no "generic" way of printing a
> collection. And the current implementation tries to give an overview what
> is contained in the collection, without trying to make it "fancy" - any
> such thing needed to be hand-coded anyway.
>
> Using repr for that is better suited, as for example string keys are
> printed with quotes around them - making clear what they are, and not
> irritating the user through potentially contained spaces or even things
> that look as if they are python objects.
>
> For example, if repr *wasn't* used,
>
> { "{foo=bar}" : "baz"}
>
> would be printed
>
> {{foo=bar} : baz}
>
> Which is *not* what the dictionary actually contains!
>
> The same goes for unicode-objects. They appear with their "funny"
> characters as \xXX-codes - instead of bailing out on you with
> unicode-errors.
>
> So, IMHO the current behavior is desired.
>
So if I want to overload something in my custom class, so that I get a nice string whether it's printed directly, or as part of a container, what is the recommendation? Overload both __str__ and __repr__?
More information about the Python-list
mailing list