getting object instead of string from dir()
rdmurray at bitdance.com
rdmurray at bitdance.com
Wed Dec 17 21:36:57 EST 2008
Quoth Rominsky <john.rominsky at gmail.com>:
> vars seems to give an identical response as locals and globals, at
> least in my test name space. All three are new commands for me. I
Without arguments vars() returns the same thing as locals().
> like the idea of adopting either vars or locals instead of dir as it
> sets up the value for me to use. I will play with them both a little
> more and read up on them to learn there uses and limitations. The key
> step for me is still to be able to automatically query the key names
> from vars or locals for what type the variable is. In my previous
> post I discussed using eval and the string in the key name such as
>
> eval('type(%s)'%vars().keys()[0])
>>> eval('type(%s)'%vars().keys()[0])
<type 'module'>
>>> vars().keys()[0]
'__builtins__'
>>> vars().values()[0]
<module '__builtin__' (built-in)>
>>> type(vars().values()[0])
<type 'module'>
>>> for name, obj in vars().items():
... print "%s (%s)" % (name, type(obj))
...
__builtins__ (<type 'module'>)
__name__ (<type 'str'>)
__doc__ (<type 'NoneType'>)
__package__ (<type 'NoneType'>)
More information about the Python-list
mailing list