something else instead of PIL?

[Daniel Fetchinson]

>> what has happened to PIL? No updates since two years.
>
> The Python Imaging Library is still current; I guess they just haven't
> found any new bugs or seen fit to add new functionality in a while,
> though I presume they'll start working on a Python 3.0 port
> eventually.

That's actually an interesting question. Does anybody know if PIL is
being ported to 3.0? Are there such plans? Maybe even code?

Cheers,
Daniel

-- 
Psss, psss, put it down! - http://www.cafepress.com/putitdown