I just killed GIL!!!

[Carl Banks]

On Apr 17, 1:03 pm, Jonathan Gardner <jgard... at jonathangardner.net>
wrote:
> On Apr 17, 1:18 am, Carl Banks <pavlovevide... at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On Apr 17, 3:37 am, Jonathan Gardner <jgard... at jonathangardner.net>
> > wrote:
> > > If you can't rewrite
> > > your algorithm to be disk or network bound, next optimization step is
> > > C.
>
> > I'm sorry, but I don't like being told to use C.  Perhaps I would like
> > the expressiveness of Python, am willing to accept the cost in
> > performance, but would also like to take advantage of technology to
> > get performance gains when I can?  What's so unreasonable about that?
>
> If you're satisfied then don't take the next optimization step.

Where do you see the word "satisfied" in what I wrote?


Carl Banks