setuptools without unexpected downloads
Ben Finney
bignose+hates-spam at benfinney.id.au
Wed Sep 26 02:20:57 EDT 2007
Ben Finney <ben at benfinney.id.au> writes:
> How can I, as the distributor of a package using setuptools, gain
> the benefits of dependency declaration and checking, without the
> drawback of unexpected and potentially unwanted download and
> installation?
To clarify: I want to retain the "assert the specified dependencies
are satisfied" behaviour, without the "... and, if not, download and
install them the Setuptools Way" behaviour.
Instead, I just want the default "dependencies not satisfied"
behaviour for my 'setup.py' program to be: complain the dependencies
aren't met, and refuse to install.
If I can set that default, and allow individual users to specifically
override that and get the "download and install un-met dependencies"
behaviour if they want, all well and good; but that's not necessary.
How can I get this happening with setuptools?
--
\ "One time a cop pulled me over for running a stop sign. He |
`\ said, 'Didn't you see the stop sign?' I said, 'Yeah, but I |
_o__) don't believe everything I read.'" -- Steven Wright |
Ben Finney
More information about the Python-list
mailing list