__contains__() and overload of in : Bug or Feature ???

[Steve Holden]

sebastien.lannez at gmail.com wrote:
> Thanks for your quick response.
> 
>>> I need to overload the operator in and let him
>>> return an object ... It seems it is not a
>>> behavior Python expect :
>>>
>>>>>> class A:
>>> ...    def __contains__(self,a):
>>> ...        return 'yop'
>>> ...
>>>>>> a=A()
>>>>>> print 'toto' in a
>>> True
>>>>>> print a.__contains__('toto')
>>> yop
> 
>> Not sure what you're trying to achieve,
> 
> Using Python as an algebraic parser for
> symbolic mathematical equation and I need
> that the 'in' operator returns an object based
> on its two arguments.
> 
>> but the semantics of the "in" operator
>> make it return a boolean value.
> 
> That is why I need to overload it.
> 
>> The string "yop" evaluates to the boolean
>> value True, as it is not empty.
> 
> Does it means that when overloading an operator, python just
> wrap the call to the method and keep control of the returned
> values ??? Is there a way to bypass this wrapping ???
> 
Certain aspects of the interpreter's behavior have ot be hard-wired in 
order for it to accomplish anything. This is one of the hard-wried 
aspects, so unless you want to change the interpreter's implementation 
I'm afraid you can't change it.

regards
  Steve

-- 
Steve Holden        +1 571 484 6266   +1 800 494 3119
Holden Web LLC/Ltd           http://www.holdenweb.com
Skype: holdenweb      http://del.icio.us/steve.holden

Sorry, the dog ate my .sigline