Will Python 3.0 remove the global interpreter lock (GIL)

Terry Reedy tjreedy at udel.edu
Thu Sep 20 14:29:10 EDT 2007


"Paul Rubin" <"http://phr.cx"@NOSPAM.invalid> wrote in message 
news:7xwsulv0y4.fsf at ruckus.brouhaha.com...
| It does sound like removing the GIL from CPython would have very high
| costs in more than one area.  Is my hope that Python will transition
| from CPython to PyPy overoptimistic?

I presume you mean 'will the leading edge reference version transition...
Or more plainly, "will Guido switch to PyPy for further development of 
Python?"  I once thought so, but 1) Google sped the arrival of Py3.0 by 
hiring Guido with a major chunk of time devoted to Python development, so 
he started before PyPy was even remotely ready (and it still is not); and 
2) PyPy did not focus only or specifically on being a CPython replacement 
but became an umbrella for a variety of experiment (including, for 
instance, a Scheme frontend). 






More information about the Python-list mailing list