The fundamental concept of continuations

[Erik Jones]

On Oct 9, 2007, at 3:32 PM, . wrote:

> On Tue, 09 Oct 2007 19:20:06 +0000, gnuist006 wrote:
>
>> On Oct 8, 11:09 pm, "." <f... at bar.biz> wrote:
>>> On Tue, 09 Oct 2007 05:15:49 +0000, gnuist006 wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>> Can anyone explain:
>>>
>>>> (1) its origin
>>>
>>> One of the lambda papers, I think.  I don't remember which.
>>
>> Hey no-name "dot" you are the only one who says its origin is in
>> one of the old lambda papers. Give me a reference or someone
>> give me a reference. I dont have access to any ACM journals or
>> other conferences. So
>
> I said "I think."  Matthias corrected me.  They're all on  
> readscheme.org
> ( http://library.readscheme.org/page1.html ) though, and well worth
> reading.
>
> I note that I'm being mocked for not using my real name by someone not
> using his/her real name.  Thank you, no-name gnuist006, you make me  
> laugh.

Relax, ., I hardly think he was mocking you.  He probably assumed  
that using a . in a sentence as a form of address would be as  
unintelligible as it has been in these two sentences.

Erik Jones

Software Developer | Emma®
erik at myemma.com
800.595.4401 or 615.292.5888
615.292.0777 (fax)

Emma helps organizations everywhere communicate & market in style.
Visit us online at http://www.myemma.com