Yet another comparison of Python Web Frameworks

Michele Simionato michele.simionato at gmail.com
Sun Oct 7 02:35:47 EDT 2007


On Oct 6, 12:57 pm, Bruno Desthuilliers
> Michele Simionato a écrit :
>
> > I looked at the source code and it seems fine to me, but I have
> > not used it directly, not stressed it. I need a
> > production-level WSGI session middleware and I wonder what the
> > players are (for instance how Beaker does compare with flup?)
>
> Can't tell, but I'd trust the Pylons team on this kind of choices.
> They're doing good job so far AFAICT.

Probably Beaker works well, but it is certainly NOT doing things
as Eby recommends:

http://dirtsimple.org/2007/02/wsgi-middleware-considered-harmful.html

BTW, I know that Eby is asking opinions about WSGI 2.0 on the
WSGI SIG and interested people may have a look there.

           Michele Simionato




More information about the Python-list mailing list