The Modernization of Emacs: terminology buffer and keybinding

[Lew]

Bent C Dalager wrote:
> In article <85hcl8qaj7.fsf at lola.goethe.zz>, David Kastrup  <dak at gnu.org> wrote:
>> bcd at pvv.ntnu.no (Bent C Dalager) writes:
>>
>>> I have never claimed equivalence. What I have made claims about are
>>> the properties of one of the meanings of a word. Specifically, my
>>> claim is that "free" is a reasonable description of some one or some
>>> thing that has been "liberated".
>> But it suggests that the natural state would be the unfree state.
> 
> Would this be a good thing? Would it be a bad thing? What is your
> point?

"There's no easy way to be free."

"The price of freedom is eternal vigilance."

Freedom is not natural.  It must be defended.

-- 
Lew