Don't use __slots__ (was Re: Problem of Readability of Python)
Aahz
aahz at pythoncraft.com
Mon Oct 15 11:40:34 EDT 2007
In article <ocudnf2qE6P46JfanZ2dnUVZ_h-vnZ2d at comcast.com>,
Steven Bethard <steven.bethard at gmail.com> wrote:
>Aahz wrote:
>> In article <2tqdncU0D6K8v5TanZ2dnUVZ_hGdnZ2d at comcast.com>,
>> Steven Bethard <steven.bethard at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> You can use __slots__ [...]
>>
>> Aaaugh! Don't use __slots__!
>>
>> Seriously, __slots__ are for wizards writing applications with huuuge
>> numbers of object instances (like, millions of instances).
>
>You clipped me saying that __slots__ are for performance tweaks:
>
> You can use __slots__ to make objects consume less memory and have
> slightly better attribute-access performance. Classes for objects
> that need such performance tweaks should start like...
>
>I fully agree that __slots__ are for applications with huge numbers of
>instances. But if you have that situation, you really do want to be
>using __slots__.
Well, then, just make sure to put big honking warnings up whenever you
mention __slots__. ;-)
--
Aahz (aahz at pythoncraft.com) <*> http://www.pythoncraft.com/
The best way to get information on Usenet is not to ask a question, but
to post the wrong information.
More information about the Python-list
mailing list