SPAM

[John Bean]

On Fri, 16 Nov 2007 15:29:09 GMT, salty at dog.com wrote:

>On Fri, 16 Nov 2007 15:08:56 -0000, "ChrisM"
><chris_mayersblue at suedeyahoo.com> wrote:
>
>>In message j80pj3dct509krdbg50lppnli60dlln6dn at 4ax.com,
>>salty at dog.com <salty at dog.com> Proclaimed from the tallest tower:
>>
>>> On Wed, 14 Nov 2007 15:12:23 -0500, Lew <lew at lewscanon.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> just bob wrote:
>>>>> "John Bean" <waterfoot at gmail.com> wrote in message
>>>>> news:uajmj398b7bscocruik918hlc0khvfn3st at 4ax.com...
>>>>>> On Wed, 14 Nov 2007 11:04:35 -0800, "just bob"
>>>>>> <kilbyfan at aoldotcom> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Your SPAM appears to be non-existent. Vapourware. Not real.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Shame, I fancied a Spam fritter.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> The guy gets Google dollars when people view the site or click on
>>>>> links, me thinks. It's spam.
>>>>
>>>> Yes, but it's not SPAM.
>>>>
>>>> SPAM is a registered trademark of Hormel Foods Corporation for a
>>>> canned pork product.
>>>>
>>>> Spam is unwanted messages or email.
>>>
>>> No, that is usually called U.C.E.
>>
>>Unsolicited Commercial Email yea, but WHO(and I'm talking about the general 
>>public) actually uses(or has even heard of) that acronym?
>
>I have, apparently!
>

Nah, you're using a proper newsreader to access Usenet so by
definition you're not "general public" who only understand
pointy-clicky-webby things.


-- 
John Bean