Firefighters at the site of WTC7 "Move away the building is going to blow up, get back the building is going to blow up."

[mike3]

On May 3, 9:53 am, malibu <vega... at accesscomm.ca> wrote:
> On May 3, 12:18 am, Eric Gisse <jowr... at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On May 2, 10:14 pm, malibu <vega... at accesscomm.ca> wrote:
>
> > > On May 2, 9:46 pm, Eric Gisse <jowr... at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > On May 2, 7:10 pm, Midex <jbmccr... at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > [...]
>
> > > > I guess the explanation that people were looking at the building and
> > > > watching its' structure deform is too rational.
>
> > > Also, that was a Larry Silverstein impostor who
> > > said they were going to 'pull it'.
>
> > ...maybe if you read the context, it would make a little more rational
> > sense. Fucking nutter.
>
> > > And the only reason he took out huge amounts
> > > of extra insurance on the buildings two months
> > > before this happened was because of global
> > > warming, because we all know a little bit of heat
> > > will bring down steel buildings.
>
> > A little heat and major structural damage.
>
> > > John
>
> Gee, I'll bet all those explosions in the
> subfloors of WTC1 + WTC2 did some
> structural damage also!
>
> Come to think of it.
>
> When the firefighters got there, all the glass
> on the street floors was blown out.
>
> Shock wave from the plane hitting
> 80 floors up?
>
> Janitors and such coming up from the basement levels
> bleeding and dazed.
>
> Jet fuel trickling down the elevator shafts being ignited
> by someone's roach? And exploding?
> Severing the three-foot thick steel columns?
> All  5 dozen of them?
> (That's mighty fine primo, pardner!)
>
> Your brain got structural damage?
> Dropped on your head as a kid?
>
> Don't put that fire iron too close
> to the flames, honey. It'll melt
> and deform!
>

Never mind that the irons in the WTC
were IN the fire, amongst the coals
no less!