On May 31, 5:59 pm, "Warren Stringer" <war... at muse.com> wrote: > Still I prefer > > funcs[:]() > > Because, I can describe it in English as "call everything that funcs has" Wouldn't funcs() be even better? It's shorter, and it seems like that's the only thing you're striving for. Why do you want to put the [:] in there all the time?