SEO - Search Engine Optimization - Seo Consulting

[Bob Phillips]

That is the oft-quoted, idiotic type of example. The reality is that if we 
follow the thread, we know the question, we only want to see the answer, not 
wade through a morass of stuff we have already seen. If we haven't seen it, 
guess what, we can go and read it.



"funfly3" <dontemailme at ntlworld.com> wrote in message 
news:EmLZh.835$r4.705 at newsfe1-gui.ntli.net...
> David wrote:
>> I am not going to join the argument,
>
> except you have
> except to say that as you can see, I
>> top post. In outlook express, you can see the messages as a thread, so 
>> you read the initial message, come to the reply and you read the response 
>> without having to scroll. Bottom posting would be fine if the previous 
>> message that promted the response was removed from the server, but it 
>> isn't, therefore, top posting is very logical.
>>
> only of you top post its logical as we all don't top post its not
>
>
> A bird
>
>
> Q name an animal that fly's
>
> see top posting is illogical
>