Qustion about struct.unpack
OhKyu Yoon
okyoon at stanford.edu
Tue May 1 11:20:41 EDT 2007
Wow, thank you all!
"Gabriel Genellina" <gagsl-py2 at yahoo.com.ar> wrote in message
news:op.trm6zrmbx6zn5v at furufufa-ec0e13.cpe.telecentro.com.ar...
> En Tue, 01 May 2007 05:22:49 -0300, eC <ericcoetzee at gmail.com> escribió:
>
>> On Apr 30, 9:41 am, Steven D'Aprano <s... at REMOVEME.cybersource.com.au>
>> wrote:
>>> On Mon, 30 Apr 2007 00:45:22 -0700, OhKyu Yoon wrote:
>
>>> > I have a really long binary file that I want to read.
>>> > The way I am doing it now is:
>>>
>>> > for i in xrange(N): # N is about 10,000,000
>>> > time = struct.unpack('=HHHH', infile.read(8))
>>> > # do something
>>> > tdc = struct.unpack('=LiLiLiLi',self.lmf.read(32))
>>>
>>> Disk I/O is slow, so don't read from files in tiny little chunks. Read a
>>> bunch of records into memory, then process them.
>>>
>>> # UNTESTED!
>>> rsize = 8 + 32 # record size
>>> for i in xrange(N//1000):
>>> buffer = infile.read(rsize*1000) # read 1000 records at once
>>> for j in xrange(1000): # process each record
>>> offset = j*rsize
>>> time = struct.unpack('=HHHH', buffer[offset:offset+8])
>>> # do something
>>> tdc = struct.unpack('=LiLiLiLi', buffer[offset+8:offset+rsize])
>>> # do something
>>>
>>> (Now I'm just waiting for somebody to tell me that file.read() already
>>> buffers reads...)
>>
>> I think the file.read() already buffers reads... :)
>
> Now we need someone to actually measure it, to confirm the expected
> behavior... Done.
>
> --- begin code ---
> import struct,timeit,os
>
> fn = r"c:\temp\delete.me"
> fsize = 1000000
> if not os.path.isfile(fn):
> f = open(fn, "wb")
> f.write("\0" * fsize)
> f.close()
> os.system("sync")
>
> def smallreads(fn):
> rsize = 40
> N = fsize // rsize
> f = open(fn, "rb")
> for i in xrange(N): # N is about 10,000,000
> time = struct.unpack('=HHHH', f.read(8))
> tdc = struct.unpack('=LiLiLiLi', f.read(32))
> f.close()
>
>
> def bigreads(fn):
> rsize = 40
> N = fsize // rsize
> f = open(fn, "rb")
> for i in xrange(N//1000):
> buffer = f.read(rsize*1000) # read 1000 records at once
> for j in xrange(1000): # process each record
> offset = j*rsize
> time = struct.unpack('=HHHH', buffer[offset:offset+8])
> tdc = struct.unpack('=LiLiLiLi', buffer[offset+8:offset+rsize])
> f.close()
>
> print "smallreads", timeit.Timer("smallreads(fn)","from __main__ import
> fn,smallreads,fsize").repeat(3,1)
> print "bigreads", timeit.Timer("bigreads(fn)", "from __main__ import
> fn,bigreads,fsize").repeat(3,1)
> --- end code ---
>
> Output:
> smallreads [4.2534193777646663, 4.126013885559789, 4.2389176672125458]
> bigreads [1.2897319939456011, 1.3076018578892405, 1.2703250635695138]
>
> So in this sample case, reading in big chunks is about 3 times faster than
> reading many tiny pieces.
>
> --
> Gabriel Genellina
More information about the Python-list
mailing list