Microsoft's Dynamic Languages Runtime (DLR)

[Fuzzyman]

On May 4, 5:27 pm, Kaz Kylheku <kkylh... at gmail.com> wrote:
> On May 2, 5:19 pm, sturlamolden <sturlamol... at yahoo.no> wrote:
>
> > On May 3, 2:15 am, Kaz Kylheku <kkylh... at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > Kindly refrain from creating any more off-topic, cross-posted threads.
> > > Thanks.
>
> > The only off-topic posting in this thread is your own (and now this
> > one).
>
> You are making a very clumsy entrance into these newsgroups. So far
> you have started two cross-posted threads. The first is only topical
> in comp.lang.python (how to emulate macros in Python). This one is
> topical in neither one, since it is about Microsoft DLR.
>
> It's quite possible that some Lisp and Python programmers have a
> strong interest in Microsoft DLR. Those people who have such an
> interest (regardless of whether they are Lisp and Python user also)
> and who like to read Usenet will almost certainly find a Microsoft DLR
> newsgroup for reading about and discussing Microsoft DLR. Do you not
> agree?
>

Given that the DLR is a dynamic language framework, abstracted out of
the IronPython 1.0 release, and that it also runs on top of the core
CLR shipped with SilverLight meaning that for the first time sandboxed
Python scripts can run in the browser...

It would seem entirely on topic for a Python newsgroup.... very on-
topic...

Fuzzyman
http://www.voidspace.org.uk/ironpython/index.shtml


> Also note that there is very rarely, if ever, any good reason for
> starting a thread which is crossposted among comp.lang.* newsgroups,
> even if the subject contains elements that are topical in all of them
> (yours does not).
>
> > Begone.
>
> You are childishly beckoning Usenet etiquette to be gone so that you
> may do whatever you wish. But I trust that you will not, out of spite
> for being rebuked, turn a few small mistakes into a persistent style.