Fortran vs Python - Newbie Question
Cameron Laird
claird at lairds.us
Mon Mar 26 11:07:17 EDT 2007
In article <mailman.5628.1174916538.32031.python-list at python.org>,
Jean-Paul Calderone <exarkun at divmod.com> wrote:
>On 26 Mar 2007 06:20:32 -0700, "Nomad.C at gmail.com" <nomad.c at gmail.com> wrote:
>>OK...
>>I've been told that Both Fortran and Python are easy to read, and are
>
>Python is hugely easier to read.
>
>>quite useful in creating scientific apps for the number crunching, but
>>then Python is a tad slower than Fortran because of its a high level
>
>Fortran is massively faster than Python.
>
>>language nature, so what are the advantages of using Python for
>>creating number crunching apps over Fortran??
>
>You can get the speed of fortran in Python by using libraries like
>Numeric without losing the readability of Python.
>
>Jean-Paul
Me, too. A lot of language questions are correctly
answered, "Indistinguishable, to within the range
of subjective response." This is NOT the case for
the readability and performance of Fortran and Python,
though; the differences are as massive as Jean-Paul
says.
HOWEVER, that's all true only in general. As a new-
comer to both Fortran and Python, there's a fair
chance that the Fortran code you first produce would
be so suboptimal as to perform no better than the
corresponding Python.
My vote, therefore, is this: unless you're in an
organization that provides a lot of Fortran support
to such beginners as yourself, choose Python. It
has all the pertinent advantages.
We can discuss secondary concerns at more length,
if you wish: Python's better suited than Fortran
for a range of other applications you might wish to
tackle some day; Python originated from a language-
for-beginners project, and truly is something you
can start to pick up in a day; your own scientific
specialty might be one that's particularly well-
endowed with an existing body of code written in
Fortran (or Python, or C++, or ...); and so on.
More information about the Python-list
mailing list