splitting common functions into a sepperate module

Bruno Desthuilliers bruno.42.desthuilliers at wtf.websiteburo.oops.com
Thu Mar 8 05:55:31 EST 2007


jonkersbart at gmail.com a écrit :
> On 8 mrt, 10:36, Bruno Desthuilliers <bruno.
(snip)
>> - wrapping the functions as methods of a class, passing the whole state
>> as args to the class initializer.
> I already considerate this one, but I don't like it because it is not
> correct in terms of the object-oriented concept.

Oh yes ? Why so ? You have a bunch of behaviors dependent on a same 
state, don't you ?


> Because there are no other solutions I have to bury my bad feelings
> and use this solution.

Better to leave "correctness of object-oriented concept" to purists and 
zealots, and use the appropriate *pragmatic* solution IMHO. No reason to 
have "bad feelings" here.



More information about the Python-list mailing list