most complete xml package for Python?

[John Machin]

On Mar 15, 3:45 am, Steve Holden <s... at holdenweb.com> wrote:
> Paul Boddie wrote:
> > On 14 Mar, 16:15, Stefan Behnel <stefan.behnel-n05... at web.de> wrote:
> >> metaperl wrote:
> >>> Without even checking them all out, I'm thinking the Amara XML Toolkit
> >>> must be the most feature-packed.
> >> Please check out lxml before you post FUD like this.
>
> >>http://codespeak.net/lxml/
>
> > Calm down, Stefan! The inquirer must have got the impression of
> > Amara's superiority from somewhere; all you need to do is to discover
> > which resource gave that impression and balance the situation out. In
> > any case, it's an opinion: there's no fear involved, and the only
> > uncertainty and doubt are in the inquirer's mind, which I suppose is
> > why they posted the inquiry.
>
> Although the phrase "without even checking them all out" hardly lends
> credence to the OP's assertion of Amara's superiority, and does tend to
> support a hypothesis involving some ulterior motive (or would if less
> ingenuously done).
>

Given keywords like "Amara" and "Elementtree" and past history, it
looked to me like a troll of one kind trying to incite a troll of
another kind to pop out from under the bridge and chew on his
ankle :-)