Collections of non-arbitrary objects ?

[Ben Finney]

walterbyrd <walterbyrd at iname.com> writes:

> Maybe it's something that doesn't "need" to be done, but it seems to
> me that would give you a certain level of built-in integrity - you
> could be sure about what's in the structure. I would not expect that
> all of python would be that rigid, but I thought it might be
> worthwhile if there were one such structure.

Can you help us understand, by showing a use case that would in your
estimation be improved by the feature you're describing?

-- 
 \         "Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum viditur."  ("Whatever is |
  `\                   said in Latin, sounds profound.")  -- Anonymous |
_o__)                                                                  |
Ben Finney