Tiny/small/minimalist Python?

[Frank Swarbrick]

rtk wrote:
> 
> I did look briefly at Python 1.5.2, since it is simpler, but I'm
> taking the trouble I've had as an excuse to learn a new language.  So
> far, I'm liking Lua, save the big pet peeve of starting indices at 1
> and not 0 as all sane people do.

Hmm, that in and of itself sounds like a good enough reason for me to 
check it out!  I despise zero-based subscripts.  If I wanted to program 
in assembler then I'd program in assembler!

:-)

Frank