Pep 3105: the end of print?

[Jean-Paul Calderone]

On Fri, 16 Feb 2007 16:49:05 +0100, BJörn Lindqvist <bjourne at gmail.com> wrote:
>On 2/16/07, Jean-Paul Calderone <exarkun at divmod.com> wrote:
>>I was just pointing out that some people might be confused.  I didn't make
>>any judgement about that fact.  You seem to be suggesting that because 
>>there
>>are other confusing things, it's okay for Python to be confusing too.  I'm
>>not making any judgements about that, either.
>
>Does not change always cause confusion? The confusion in Python land
>is pretty minor in comparison to the one caused Java 1.1, 1.2, 1.3,
>1.4, 1.5, 1.6, 1, 2, 4, 5, 6 SE/ME/EE.

You're just repeating the same argument.  I don't buy it, but I'm sure you
and other people will continue to repeat it.  Fine, whatever, but I'm not
interested, and your not countering the point I made.

>
>I think that people are just complaining to much. The python-devvers
>are managing the transition extraordinarily well.
>> >Even in the Python world, nobody expects to run the same code base under
>> >C Python and Jython and IronPython and PyPy.
>> >
>>
>>I wonder if the fact that Jython and IronPython can't run most Python 
>>programs
>>is one of the reasons they are generally only used in special 
>>circumstances?
>
>Or maybe it is because Jython requires Java and IronPython a CLR?
>

I have a JVM and I have Mono.  I don't use Jython or IronPython.  Maybe
because none of my Python programs run on it?

Jean-Paul