builtin set literal
Steven Bethard
steven.bethard at gmail.com
Wed Feb 21 14:31:52 EST 2007
bearophileHUGS at lycos.com wrote:
> Steven Bethard:
>> take a look at the current state of tuples:
>> 1, 2
>> 1,
>> ()
>
> That's not a good situation. I presume the situation/syntax of tuples
> in Python 2.x can't be improved. But can it be improved for Py 3.0?
I'm not really losing any sleep over the current tuple syntax. ;-) The
empty tuple is so uncommon in my code that the fact that it's spelled
differently just doesn't bother me.
And anyway, if I've learned anything from the Python community over the
years, it's that syntax is best left to Guido. ;-)
STeVe
More information about the Python-list
mailing list