On Dec 8, 7:44 pm, MonkeeSage <MonkeeS... at gmail.com> wrote:
> I think it muddies the water to say that a.a() and a.a are the same
> thing--obviously they are not.
A thing is not what it is;
A thing is what it does.
This is the Way of the Duck.
-- Basho (in his "3 extra syllables" phase)