reloading modules and isinstance()

Tlis tlis01 at googlemail.com
Wed Dec 5 13:06:43 EST 2007


On 5 Dec, 13:18, Steven D'Aprano <st... at REMOVE-THIS-
cybersource.com.au> wrote:
> On Tue, 04 Dec 2007 15:41:48 +0100, Diez B. Roggisch wrote:
> > You just discovered one reason why reload() is a bad idea and IMHO
> > shouldn't be used at all - as tempting it might be.
>
> I disagree -- I find reload() extremely useful for interactively testing
> modules. But I would never dream of using it in production code!
>
> --
> Steven.

Please note, that I was using the 'Reload modules' functionality of
the software system in use, rather than the reload() function
directly. I admit, though, that in the background it just may call
reload() ...

With all the problems of the reload() function, I still hope, that
there should be possible to write a safe module 'reloader', that would
fix the references, as required (e.g. by changing the
variable.__class__ references). This should be provided by every
serious Python development environment.



More information about the Python-list mailing list