Why custom objects take so much memory?
Steven D'Aprano
steven at REMOVE.THIS.cybersource.com.au
Wed Dec 19 00:06:53 EST 2007
On Tue, 18 Dec 2007 21:13:14 +0100, Hrvoje Niksic wrote:
> Each object takes 36 bytes itself: 4 bytes refcount + 4 bytes type ptr +
> 4 bytes dict ptr + 4 bytes weakptr + 12 bytes gc overhead. That's not
> counting malloc overhead, which should be low since objects aren't
> malloced individually. Each object requires a dict, which consumes
> additional 52 bytes of memory (40 bytes for the dict struct plus 12 for
> gc). That's 88 bytes per object, not counting malloc overhead.
And let's not forget that if you're running on a 64-bit system, you can
double the size of every pointer.
Is there a canonical list of how much memory Python objects take up? Or a
canonical algorithm?
Or failing either of those, a good heuristic?
> Then there's string allocation: your average string is 6 chars long; add
> to that one additional char for the terminating zero.
Are you sure about that? If Python strings are zero terminated, how does
Python deal with this?
>>> 'a\0string'[1]
'\x00'
--
Steven
More information about the Python-list
mailing list