Is a "real" C-Python possible?

[George Sakkis]

On Dec 12, 2:18 am, Kay Schluehr <kay.schlu... at gmx.net> wrote:
> On Dec 12, 7:34 am, sturlamolden <sturlamol... at yahoo.no> wrote:

> > I am not sure why a new type annotation syntax was needed Python 3:
>
> Because people care about a feature when there is @syntax.

Good point; the inverse is not true though: time and time again people
cared about some syntax for properties without any change so far. The
result is a handful of different ways to spell out properties; python
2.6 will add yet another variation (http://mail.python.org/pipermail/
python-dev/2007-October/075057.html).

George