Happy Christmas Pythoneers

[Aahz]

In article <pan.2007.12.27.07.47.28 at REMOVE.THIS.cybersource.com.au>,
Steven D'Aprano  <steven at REMOVE.THIS.cybersource.com.au> wrote:
>On Wed, 26 Dec 2007 21:32:54 -0800, mensanator at aol.com wrote:
>> 
>> Hey, my version of the person module doesn't have an is_appropriate_sex
>> attribute, but an is_opposite_sex attribute instead. Is this a new
>> version?
>
>Generally instances use:
>
>person.is_appropriate_sex = person.is_opposite_sex
>
>but some instances define it as:
>
>person.is_appropriate_sex = not person.is_opposite_sex
>
>It's an implementation detail, you shouldn't worry about it.

Then again, some instances define it as

person.is_appropriate_sex = True
-- 
Aahz (aahz at pythoncraft.com)           <*>         http://www.pythoncraft.com/

"Typing is cheap.  Thinking is expensive."  --Roy Smith