Stackless Integration

[Bruno Desthuilliers]

Steve Holden a écrit :
> Bruno Desthuilliers wrote:
>> Jean-Paul Calderone a écrit :
>>> On Thu, 09 Aug 2007 09:00:27 -0000, "Justin T." <jmtulloss at gmail.com> 
>>> wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> I've been looking at stackless python a little bit, and it's awesome.
>>>> My question is, why hasn't it been integrated into the upstream python
>>>> tree? Does it cause problems with the current C-extensions? It seems
>>>> like if something is fully compatible and better, then it would be
>>>> adopted. However, it hasn't been in what appears to be 7 years of
>>>> existence, so I assume there's a reason.
>>> It's not Pythonic.
>>
>> Hum... Yes ? Really ? Care to argument ?
> 
> Unfortunately such arguments quickly descend to the "yes it is", "no it 
> isn't" level, as there is no objective measure of Pythonicity.

indeed !-)

But that doesn't prevent from honestly trying to explain why one asserts 
such a thing - which Jean-Paul did in another post in this thread.

> Twisted is a complex set of packages

Sure. Now I may be dumb, but I thought it was about stackless, not about 
Twisted...