zzbbaadd at aol.com a écrit :
(snip)
> I don't think that is the definition used across computer science.
>
> It suddenly dawned on me that what would be best would be a contains()
> (or IN syntax for those who can't afford to wait) for lists.
No need to wait:
>>> 'a' in ['a', 'b']
True
>>> ['a', 'b'].__contains__('a')
True