Problem with global variables

[Bjoern Schliessmann]

Laurent Pointal wrote:

> Yes, and i replies: "which contains a foo assignment. As foo is
> not defined "global", it is considered to be local. " 
> 
> Maybe my explanation was not clear enough with variable foo to be
> considered local because there is an *assignment* to foo.

Yep, thanks for the clarification. After four replies and despite
weird conjugations, I've definitely got it now ... ;)

Regards,


Björn

-- 
BOFH excuse #113:

Root nameservers are out of sync