Any way to refactor this?

[John Salerno]

John Salerno wrote:
> Setting aside, for the moment, the utility of this method or even if 
> there's a better way, I'm wondering if this is an efficient way to do 
> it. I admit, there was some copying and pasting, which is what prompts 
> me to ask the question. Here's the method. (I hope it looks ok, because 
> it looks really weird for me right now)

Thanks guys. I'm going to look over all this and see what I can do.