Video: Professor of Physics Phd at Cal Tech says: 911 Inside Job
Mitchell Jones
mjones at 21cenlogic.com
Sun Apr 29 18:19:18 EDT 2007
In article <1177788032.971421.65550 at c35g2000hsg.googlegroups.com>,
War Office <911falseflag at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 28 abr, 14:15, Eric Gisse <jowr... at gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Apr 24, 6:13 pm, stj... at rock.com wrote:
[snip]
> > I love how folks like you ask for intellectual honesty when every
> > effort is made to ignore evidence that doesn't agree with your
> > presupposed findings.
>
> Which evidence would that be?
***{I'm not a fan of the Bush administration, and would not put it past
them to carry out an event such as 911, to create an excuse to jettison
the Constitution and Bill of Rights. What is certain in any case is
that, in fact, the Bush administration has used the events of 911 as an
excuse to toss out the Constitution and Bill of Rights. There are,
however, at least three possible scenarios regarding 911 itself:
(1) The plane crashes were planned and executed by terrorists. The
towers fell because of the impacts. Building 7 fell because of the
impact of debris from the north tower.
(2) The plane crashes were planned and executed by the Bush
administration. The towers fell because of the impacts. Building 7 fell
because of the impact of debris from the north tower.
(3) The plane crashes were planned and executed by the Bush
administration. The towers fell because of the impacts, plus the effects
of pre-planted demolition charges. Building 7 fell because of the impact
of debris from the north tower, plus the effects of pre-planted
explosive charges.
I analyzed (3), above, in great detail a month or so back, in a
sci.physics thread entitled "The amazing denial of what "conspiracy
kooks" really means...." If you are really interested in a reasoned
response to those arguments, you can probably still find that thread on
Google.
My conclusion at the time was that possibility (3), above, fails because
pre-planted explosives are not needed to explain why the towers fell, or
why building 7 fell. Possibilities (1) and (2), therefore, are all that
remains.
This post is for informational purposes only, and is not to be taken as
an indication that I am interesting in slogging my way through all this
stuff again. Once is more than enough, and so I am killfiling this
thread after making this post.
--Mitchell Jones}***
*****************************************************************
If I seem to be ignoring you, consider the possibility
that you are in my killfile. --MJ
More information about the Python-list
mailing list