Video: Professor of Physics Phd at Cal Tech says: 911 Inside Job

Mitchell Jones mjones at 21cenlogic.com
Sun Apr 29 18:19:18 EDT 2007


In article <1177788032.971421.65550 at c35g2000hsg.googlegroups.com>,
 War Office <911falseflag at gmail.com> wrote:

> On 28 abr, 14:15, Eric Gisse <jowr... at gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Apr 24, 6:13 pm, stj... at rock.com wrote:

[snip]

> > I love how folks like you ask for intellectual honesty when every
> > effort is made to ignore evidence that doesn't agree with your
> > presupposed findings.
> 
> Which evidence would that be? 

***{I'm not a fan of the Bush administration, and would not put it past 
them to carry out an event such as 911, to create an excuse to jettison 
the Constitution and Bill of Rights. What is certain in any case is 
that, in fact, the Bush administration has used the events of 911 as an 
excuse to toss out the Constitution and Bill of Rights. There are, 
however, at least three possible scenarios regarding 911 itself:

(1) The plane crashes were planned and executed by terrorists. The 
towers fell because of the impacts. Building 7 fell because of the 
impact of debris from the north tower.

(2) The plane crashes were planned and executed by the Bush 
administration. The towers fell because of the impacts. Building 7 fell 
because of the impact of debris from the north tower. 

(3) The plane crashes were planned and executed by the Bush 
administration. The towers fell because of the impacts, plus the effects 
of pre-planted demolition charges. Building 7 fell because of the impact 
of debris from the north tower, plus the effects of pre-planted 
explosive charges. 

I analyzed (3), above, in great detail a month or so back, in a 
sci.physics thread entitled "The amazing denial of what "conspiracy 
kooks" really means...." If you are really interested in a reasoned 
response to those arguments, you can probably still find that thread on 
Google.

My conclusion at the time was that possibility (3), above, fails because 
pre-planted explosives are not needed to explain why the towers fell, or 
why building 7 fell. Possibilities (1) and (2), therefore, are all that 
remains.

This post is for informational purposes only, and is not to be taken as 
an indication that I am interesting in slogging my way through all this 
stuff again. Once is more than enough, and so I am killfiling this 
thread after making this post.

--Mitchell Jones}***

*****************************************************************
If I seem to be ignoring you, consider the possibility
that you are in my killfile. --MJ



More information about the Python-list mailing list