Python component model

[Edward Diener No Spam]

Richard Brodie wrote:
> "Edward Diener No Spam" <eldiener_no_spam_here at earthlink.net> wrote in message 
> news:WvMWg.12223$UG4.9358 at newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net...
> 
>> "Thinking in Java or C++" as opposed to Python does not mean anything to me as a general 
>> statement. I am well aware of the difference between statically and dynamically typed 
>> languages but why this should have anything to do with RAD programming is beyond me. Do 
>> you care to elucidate this distinction ?
> 
> I think this blog entry http://osteele.com/archives/2004/11/ides
> provides some insight into the point of view expressed. 

I think that one can easily be both, someone who is good at using a 
language and someone who is good at using a visual tool. The dichotomy 
presented in the article exists only for a small number of people.