hundreds of seconds?

[Duncan Booth]

"Diez B. Roggisch" <deets at nospam.web.de> wrote:

> However, be aware that your OS may limit the precision here. I'm not
> sure, but I think Windows for example doesn't get faster than 10th or
> 100th of a second.

1/100th of a second.

> 
> For more precise timing, you might need a special library/extension
> that works with the cpu timer register or something like that.

Or in Windows case just call time.clock() instead.