The Python Papers Edition One

[Alan J. Salmoni]

I heartily agree. pdf format has never been much of a problem for me.
Now that you have an ISSN, has it been submitted to Google Scholar or
other academic indexes?

http://scholar.google.com/intl/en/scholar/about.html for Google Scholar
http://citeseer.ist.psu.edu/submitDocument.html for Citeseer

These are two I can think of but there must be more. Any suggestions?

I think that this is great work guys - I'll see if I can take some time
to submit some of the code I developed a few years ago.

All the best!

Alan

Łukasz Langa wrote:

> Fredrik Lundh:
> > Tennessee Leeuwenburg wrote:
> >
> >
> >> If anyone has any good ideas for how to cope as a publisher with these
> >> difficulties, I'm all ears.
> >>
> >
> > has any of the format zealots posting to this thread actually
> > volunteered to produce any material for your publication?  if not, I
> > suggest ignoring them.  any bozo with a keyboard can contribute stop
> > energy to a project, but at the end, it's always the people *doing*
> > things that matters.
> >
> > </F>
>
> +1
>
> The Python Papers look very, very promising! I'm looking forward to
> reading next editions. Don't let whiners slow you down. PDF is a good
> choice, I personally like to print out longer things I read. IANAL, so I
> won't speak for or against CC licenses. They're used widely nowadays for
> a variety of applications (music, art, software, publications) so it
> seems they're doing their job.
> 
> Keep up the good work!
> 
> Best regards,
> Łukasz Langa