The Python Papers Edition One
Paul Boddie
paul at boddie.org.uk
Fri Nov 24 05:41:47 EST 2006
Shane Hathaway wrote:
>
> IMHO your licensing terms are fine; you don't need to switch from the CC
> license. Just avoid the term "free as in freedom", since the Free
> Software Foundation has assigned that phrase a very specific meaning.
Agreed. It should also be noted that Debian - amongst the strictest
with regard to software and content licensing - do not regard the CC
licences as being "free as in freedom":
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Creative_Commons_licenses
http://people.debian.org/~evan/ccsummary.html
http://people.debian.org/~evan/draftresponse.txt
Consequently, it may be appropriate to remind authors to also make
their works more widely available under a licence that may permit
further distribution, if that is desirable.
Paul
P.S. I still don't really understand why the FSF unreservedly
recommends the Free Art licence when it has a "choice of law" clause
that has prevented things like the GPL-compatibility of other licences
in the past.
More information about the Python-list
mailing list