Ruby/Python/REXX as a MUCK scripting language
Laurent Pointal
laurent.pointal at limsi.fr
Mon Nov 27 07:14:59 EST 2006
Fred Bayer a écrit :
>
> Tony Belding wrote:
>> I'm interested in using an off-the-shelf interpreted language as a
>> user-accessible scripting language for a MUCK. I'm just not sure if I
>> can find one that does everything I need. The MUCK must be able to
>> call the interpreter and execute scripts with it, but the interpreter
>> must also be able to call functions in the MUCK code. And then
>> there's the security issue that really worries me. . . I have to be
>> able to limit what the interpreter can execute. I can't have my users
>> running scripts that access the console, access the filesystem or
>> sockets directly, or call libraries or other binaries outside the MUCK.
>>
>> Is this practical? I'm thinking of Ruby or Python for this, if they
>> can meet the requirements.
>>
>
> Don't forget Lua: www.lua.org
> It fulfills your requirements and is easily embedable.
>
I Agree with F.Bayer, when reading OP post, I immediatly think about Lua.
More information about the Python-list
mailing list