whats your favourite object relational mapper?

[Steve Holden]

Jonathan Ellis wrote:
> Steve Holden wrote:
> 
>>I think describing this as Ian saying the code in its current form "is a
>>dead end" is to read rather more into the words than is actually there.
> 
> 
> Well, that may be.  However, given that the 0.x code is so crufty that
> the v2 "refactor" is a multi-day (-week, now) process that merits a new
> project name, and there are enough architecture warts that it's not
> worth it to keep v2 backwards compatible, I'm not sure what
> requirements of being a dead end are missing here. :)
> 
> I suppose that in one sense no OSS project is a dead end since you can
> always pick up the pieces yourself, but it's clear the 0.x series is
> not a place to expect much in the way of new developments from its
> author.
> 
Sure, we can agree on that. I though you meant to imply that Ian was 
abandoning the concepts behind SQLObject rather that the somewhat crufty 
initial implementation.

regards
  Steve
-- 
Steve Holden       +44 150 684 7255  +1 800 494 3119
Holden Web LLC/Ltd                 www.holdenweb.com
Love me, love my blog         holdenweb.blogspot.com