Xah's Edu Corner: The Concepts and Confusions of Pre-fix, In-fix, Post-fix and Fully Functional Notations

[Timo Stamm]

Fuzzyman schrieb:
> Roedy Green wrote:
>> On 15 Mar 2006 22:20:52 -0800, "Xah Lee" <xah at xahlee.org> wrote,
>> quoted or indirectly quoted someone who said :
>>
>>> e. For example, the in-fix
>>> notation =E2=80=9C(3+(2*5))>7=E2=80=9D is written as =E2=80=9C3 2 5 * + 7 >=
>>> =E2=80=9D, where the
>> Not that Mr. Lee has ever shown much interest in feedback, but you
>> pretty well have stick to vanilla ASCII to get your notation through
>> unmangled on newsgroups.
> 
> Hmmm... it displays fine via google groups. Maybe it's the reader which
> is 'non-compliant' ?


Other charsets than US-ASCII are widely accepted in non-english 
newsgroups as long as the charset is properly declared.

Xah's posting was properly encoded and will display fine in every decent 
newsreader.


Timo