Saying "latently-typed language" is making a category mistake

[Jürgen Exner]

Vesa Karvonen wrote:
> In comp.lang.functional Anton van Straaten <anton at appsolutions.com>
> wrote: [...]
>> I reject this comparison.  There's much more to it than that.  The
>
> I think that we're finally getting to the bottom of things.  While
> reading your reponses something became very clear to me:
> latent-typing and latent- types are not a property of languages.
> Latent-typing, also known as informal reasoning, is something that

And what does this have to do with Perl? Are you an alter ego of Xha Lee who 
spills his 'wisdom' across any newsgroup he can find?

jue