Writing PNG with pure Python

[Johann C. Rocholl]

Alan Isaac schrieb:
> It's your code, so you get to license it.
> But if you wish to solicit patches,
> a more Pythonic license is IMHO more likely
> to prove fruitful.

What license would you suggest? After some reading at [1] and [2] and
[3], I found that the Academic Free License (version 2.1) and the
Apache License (version 2.0) are considered helpful for contributions
to the Python Software Foundation.

So far, I haven't used either of these licenses for my own code, and
after a little reading the AFL seems okay for me. I would perhaps
consider the LGPL [4] as an alternative because it is less restrictive
than the GPL.

Thoughts or links, anybody?

Cheers,
Johann

[1] http://www.python.org/moin/PythonSoftwareFoundationLicenseFaq
[2] http://www.python.org/psf/records/board/minutes/2004-11-09/
[3] http://www.python.org/psf/contrib/
[4] http://www.gnu.org/licenses/lgpl.html