Dispatch with multiple inheritance
Michael J. Fromberger
Michael.J.Fromberger at Clothing.Dartmouth.EDU
Wed Jul 19 20:48:07 EDT 2006
In article <mailman.8352.1153350286.27775.python-list at python.org>,
Michael Spencer <mahs at telcopartners.com> wrote:
> As others have pointed out, super, is designed to do something different from
> what you want. See
> http://www.python.org/download/releases/2.2.3/descrintro/#cooperation for
> GvR's
> explanation of super's intent, limitations, and a pure-python
> implementation
> that you might alter for your purposes.
Indeed so. The documentation for super() led me to an erroneous
conclusion.
> Given what you assert about your inheritance graph (two independent ancestor
> chains, that do not propagate super calls from their respective base
> classes),
> what is objectionable about:
> > C.__init__(self, ...)
> > D.__init__(self, ...)
Well, since super() were much better labelled call_next_method, I must
agree that the Class.__init__(self, ...) form is probably the best
solution!
Thanks for your feedback.
Cheers,
-M
--
Michael J. Fromberger | Lecturer, Dept. of Computer Science
http://www.dartmouth.edu/~sting/ | Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, USA
More information about the Python-list
mailing list