find_longest_match in SequenceMatcher
koara
koara at atlas.cz
Mon Jul 24 09:42:22 EDT 2006
John Machin wrote:
> --test results snip---
> Looks to me like the problem has nothing at all to do with the length
> of the searched strings, but a bug appeared in 2.3. What version(s)
> were you using? Can you reproduce your results (500 & 499 giving
> different answers) with the same version?
Hello John, thank you for investigating and responding!
Yes, I can reproduce the behaviour with different results within the
same version -- which is 2.4.3 (#69, Mar 29 2006, 17:35:34) [MSC v.1310
32 bit (Intel)]
The catch is to remove the last character, as i described in my
original post, as opposed to passing reduced length parameters to
find_longest_match, which is what you did.
It is morning now, but i still fail to see the mistake i am making --
if it is indeed a bug, where do i report it?
Cheers!
More information about the Python-list
mailing list