Need a compelling argument to use Django instead of Rails
Vincent Delporte
justask at acme.com
Sat Jul 29 08:32:22 EDT 2006
On Sat, 29 Jul 2006 04:07:12 GMT, Tim Roberts <timr at probo.com> wrote:
>Exactly. The Python interpreter can take a significant fraction of a
>second to start. For the typical short web request, the overhead can add
>up.
>
>On the other hand, unless you're handling dozens of requests per minute,
>users are unlikely to notice.
>
>You can also keep session state in memory instead of spilling to disk, and
>you can keep database sessions open.
Thanks for the explanations.
More information about the Python-list
mailing list