Isn't there a better way?

[Bruno Desthuilliers]

Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
> In message <mailman.8441.1153723298.27775.python-list at python.org>, Steve
> Holden wrote:
> 
> 
>>Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
>>
>>>In message <44c26d8c$0$11738$636a55ce at news.free.fr>, Bruno Desthuilliers
>>>wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>Lawrence D'Oliveiro a écrit :
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>If you're calling a number of different routines in
>>>>>the Processor class, all accessing the same data, then it makes perfect
>>>>>sense to only pass it once.
>>>>
>>>>Actually they are not "passed".
>>>
>>>
>>>I think I'm going to plonk you.
>>
>>And the rest of comp.lang.python has to know about this because ... ?
> 
> 
> Some of them might be worth plonking as well?

Certainly. I suggest that you put in your killfile anyone not agreeing
with you on any point, or having the bad idea to point out inexact or
ambigous stuff in your posts. This will surely make this ng a very more
friendly place to you - while perhaps not as useful.

-- 
bruno desthuilliers
python -c "print '@'.join(['.'.join([w[::-1] for w in p.split('.')]) for
p in 'onurb at xiludom.gro'.split('@')])"