ConfigParser: writes a list but reads a string?
Jeffrey Barish
jeff_barish at earthlink.net
Sun Jan 22 13:20:52 EST 2006
funkyj wrote:
> making the config file XML and using xml.dom is another option,
> although XML is a bit ugly to edit by hand.
> --jfc
>
I am seriously intrigued by ConfigObj. I am currently using an crude
improvisation involving tab-delimited fields to store metadata for
recordings -- not configuration data -- in text files. I had been planning
to convert to XML, but now I am wondering whether ConfigObj would be
easier. I would like for the metadata files to be editable, but editing
does not have to be easy as it needs to be done rarely. I've never used
XML, so I am wondering whether there are other tradeoffs between that
approach and ConfigObj that I should be aware of. I was thinking of XML
mainly to have a more robust format. For example, it would be nice if it
were possible to add fields without obsoleting early versions of the
reader. Crossplatform compatibility is also desirable.
--
Jeffrey Barish
More information about the Python-list
mailing list