Python vs. Lisp -- please explain
gene tani
gene.tani at gmail.com
Sun Feb 19 01:35:32 EST 2006
63q2o4i02 at sneakemail.com wrote:
>
> I'm wondering if someone can explain to me please what it is about
> Python that is so different from Lisp that it can't be compiled into
> something as fast as compiled Lisp? From this above website and
> others, I've learned that compiled Lisp can be nearly as fast as C/C++,
> so I don't understand why Python can't also eventually be as efficient?
> Is there some *specific* basic reason it's tough? Or is it that this
> type of problem in general is tough, and Lisp has 40+ years vs Python's
> ~15 years?
>
>
i'm not sure it'll answer question, but Brett cannon's thesis is good
background
http://www.ocf.berkeley.edu/~bac/thesis.pdf
More information about the Python-list
mailing list