Which is faster? (if not b in m) or (if m.count(b) > 0)
Farel
c_shyone at yahoo.com
Fri Feb 17 11:07:27 EST 2006
Previous message (by thread):
Which is faster? (if not b in m) or (if m.count(b) > 0)
Next message (by thread):
Which is faster? (if not b in m) or (if m.count(b) > 0)
Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
Great observations... Changing for lists to tuples would make sorting unnecessary...
Previous message (by thread):
Which is faster? (if not b in m) or (if m.count(b) > 0)
Next message (by thread):
Which is faster? (if not b in m) or (if m.count(b) > 0)
Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
More information about the Python-list mailing list